Unfortunately, I couldn't make the "Faith Seeking Understanding" discussion in a local hostelry last night. The discussion was on William P. Young's "The Shack".
I've found Tim Keller's review to be helpful:
However, sprinkled throughout the book, Young’s story undermines a
number of traditional Christian doctrines. Many have gotten involved in
debates about Young’s theological beliefs, and I have my own strong
concerns. But here is my main problem with the book. Anyone who is
strongly influenced by the imaginative world of
The Shack
will be totally unprepared for the far more multi-dimensional and
complex God that you actually meet when you read the Bible. In the
prophets the reader will find a God who is constantly condemning and
vowing judgment on his enemies, while the Persons of the Triune-God of
The Shack
repeatedly deny that sin is any offense to them. The reader of Psalm
119 is filled with delight at God’s statutes, decrees, and laws, yet
the God of
The Shack insists that he doesn’t give us any
rules or even have any expectations of human beings. All he wants is
relationship. The reader of the lives of Abraham, Jacob, Moses, and
Isaiah will learn that the holiness of God makes his immediate presence
dangerous or fatal to us. Someone may counter (as Young seems to do, on
p.192) that because of Jesus, God is now only a God of love, making all
talk of holiness, wrath, and law obsolete. But when John, one of Jesus’
closest friends, long after the crucifixion sees the risen Christ in
person on the isle of Patmos, John ‘fell at his feet as dead.’
(Rev.1:17.)
The Shack effectively deconstructs the holiness
and transcendence of God. It is simply not there. In its place is
unconditional love, period. The God of
The Shack has none of the balance and complexity of the Biblical God. Half a God is not God at all.
Recent Comments